Issue 45



In this quarter’s informative, thought provoking issue:

Palestine Destroyed on Google Maps

Post Fukushima: US EPA Raises Radiation Limits

Terrorism and the Fluttering False Flags

How Hillary Will Steal the US Election

The Obvious Question No One is Asking Obama

Did Hitler Escape Germany to Live in Paraguay Until His Death in 1971?

Italians Blow The Lid off the Chemtrail Secret Ops!

Religion: Why Are the Pyramids Not Mentioned in the Bible?

Nine Questions That Stump Every Vaccine Advocate

…and not forgetting the latest fascinating Lunar Anomalies pics and analyses!


“You won’t get a better deal than this!”





Click here to buy




UNCENSORED magazine is actually the best-selling English language “alternative” news magazine in the Southern Hemisphere – and has been for over 10 years!

Launched in New Zealand and Australia in 2005, UNCENSORED quickly established itself as the leading “alternative” magazine in both countries and built a reputation as a highly respected, profoundly interesting magazine, featuring some of the best writers in the world.

Edited by Jonathan Eisen (author of Suppressed Inventions and other Discoveries), UNCENSORED has been in the forefront of major issues such as the real perpetrators of 9/11, alternative energy (and its suppression), the UFO cover-up, the GMO scandal and the dangers of corporate science, suppressed cancer breakthroughs, the global warming hoax, and many, many others topics that will open your eyes.

With over 90% of today’s media sources owned by only 6 corporations, can we honestly believe that we’re getting an unbiased, objective view of what is really going on in the world today?

It is for this reason that UNCENSORED is a completely independent enterprise with no affiliation or alliance to any corporation, religion, political party or organization.

And as such, it is free to publish even the most controversial articles that reveal the truth to an increasingly deceived society.

In this age of rampant conformity, manufactured consent for war and the poisoning of our land, water and air, UNCENSORED provides the catalyst and the resources that empower each of our readers to think for themselves.

In fact that’s our motto: “Think for Yourself”.


In a world where nearly every publisher’s survival is completely dependent on its advertisers (as witnessed by their 60% – 40% ads-to-articles ratio), UNCENSORED is almost entirely reader-supported.

OUR POLICY IS TO HAVE NO MORE THAN 10% ADVERTISING. (And the ads we do accept are only for products we really believe in.)

Our philosophy is simple: Dependence begets subservience, so a truly free press cannot exist if it is beholden to any entity other than its readers. In fact, our entire business model is predicated on the idea that Americans are finally beginning to wake-up to the extent and magnitude of the deception.

And they want the truth, for a change.

UNCENSORED is available in NZ and Australia a hundreds of newsagents and also individual copies and subscriptions from

UNCENSORED is NOT available in any stores within the United States, but ONLY by subscription (or individual copies) through this website:

Site Icon

The Great Vaccine Hoax


This is the cover-up of all time. Show this to your doctor!
Or if you are a doctor reading this, show it to yourself.
– Jon Eisen

VaccineGate: 30 years of Secret Meetings, Conflict of Interests, Dubious Science




Now available from the uncensored shop

SOLVING 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World

Click here to download


The Kaikoura UFO Incident: Case Solved?


“Those soulless realists who were not there will never know the unbelievable beauty of that light show. I can flick a mental switch and be back there in instant, sweat trickling down my back, the noise of the engines suffocating me, the light show outside the window fusing my brain.”Quentin Fogarty, “Let’s Hope They’re Friendly”1982.

“Is everybody ready here on the Dark Side of the Moon?”

A line from Stephen Spielberg’s Sci Fi blockbuster movie Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

The Dark Side of the Moon was the code name of a secret base set up to host a spectacular encounter with extraterrestrials  who seem to enjoy pretty coloured lights and music!

The Dark Side of the Moon is also the name of the legendary album by Pink Floyd, and it’s iconic cover art of a prism intended to symbolise that band’s reputation for spectacular sound and light shows that are simultaneously informative and transformative.

See a connection here?

Spielberg’s movie helped bring the subject of UFOs back into the public spotlight, and it’s possible this movie was part of a bigger picture; an indoctrination programme that continues to this day, to plant the idea of extraterrestrial visitation firmly in the minds of the public. In the 1980’s, this programme would acquire a name: Project Blue Beam.

An early sequence in Spielberg’s movie features radar operators gathered around a screen as a breathless pilot describes a mysterious brightly lit object, visible on radar as an uncorrelated target, which  seems to play “chicken” with the helpless airliner. “Do you wish to file a report of any kind?” asks the controller. “I wouldn’t know what kind of report to file!” answers the shaken pilot.

Image result for close encounters of the third kind radar room scene

A short while after the movies release, on the East Coast of New Zealand’s South Island, this scene would be played out for real……

21st December 1978.Approx. 1am: The crew of an Argosy Freight plane headed up the East Coast of New Zealand witness  a variety of airborne light sources, some of which appear to have light beams emanating from them. Captain Randle suggests they may be helicopters engaged in a military exercise. Targets were simultaneously showing up on control tower radar, and a ground witness at Woodbourne AFB had confirmed anomalous lights in the region.

Finally, a large object was observed to alternate between motionless hovering and performing some extraordinary manoeuvres, somewhat perplexing as the radar was set to ignore stationary objects!

Meanwhile back at Woodbourne, a second Argosy was setting off on a freight run, and captain Vern Powell was asked to keep a lookout for any sign of the objects.

They soon had an encounter with the large stationary object that puzzled the radar operators:

RADAR: 10′ o clock to you range 30 miles, a large target…tracked down from Wellington….has tracked down to 60 miles and has remained stationery for 3/4 hour…now moved 20 miles to the West.

PLANE: We have a bright red glowing light…10 o’ clock position…definitely airborne.

RADAR: the ones off Clarence coast have disappeared…..the bright red one has also faded from radar…

PLANE: It’s still there…very bright!

(The stationary object reappears on radar approx. 2-3000ft6 above the aircraft)

PLANE: It appears to be stationary at the moment, is that right?

RADAR: that is confirmed, been stationary for about 45 minutes….

(The object suddenly begins to move, taking a parallel track with the freighter)

RADAR: That one on your left…starting to move in the same direction as yourself….moved approximately 4 miles as we have been speaking.‘

PLANE: Yes, the light has just gone out.

RADAR: He has disappeared from radar too.

(the object reappears both on radar and visually and tracks the plane for 12 miles before disappearing again. At the same time Andy Herd of Wellington radar calls up Christchurch radar room)

WELLINGTON RADAR: Jackpot! Southbound Argosy has seen a big red “thing….”


WR:…yes about 10,000feet, about 2000 feet above him, confirmed on radar!

Both Northbound and Southbound freight planes continued to see radar-confirmed lights that night, and later checks with NZ military authorities were met with denials that any exercises or experimentation were taking place in the area at the time.

But this was nothing compared to what was to come.

Two months earlier, an Australian UFO case had made waves in the mainstream media with the unexplained disappearance of an amateur pilot, Fred Valentich. Transcripts of the radio communications in Valentich’s final moments, sound, once again, like something from a sci fi movie: It is clear that Valentich’s Cessna was approached by a missile-like object capable of hovering stationery and emitting a green light. The device hovered above the Cessna, and the plane’s engine began to malfunction. The final transmission was 17 seconds of static and a metallic screeching.

Naturally, Australian media was subsequently on the lookout for anything UFO related in the Southern hemisphere that might make a good follow-up to the Valentich case.


And Australia’s Channel O not only picked up on the NZ media coverage of the 21 December Argosy Radar-Visual encounters, but happened to have one of their reporters, Quentin Fogarty, holidaying in New Zealand at the time.

A camera team was quickly assembled, with Fogarty joined by cameraman David Crockett and his wife and sound recordist, Ngaire Crockett, to film a segment on the events including a re-enactment of the events aboard an Argosy Air Freighter, piloted by Capt. Bill Startup and 1st Mate Bob Guard.

The rest is history, with the team filming a variety of unidentified objects, correlating with radar returns, on both legs of the journey. The most famous segment being of the large orb like shape that featured in television news items around the world.…

Finally it seemed the Holy Grail of UFO research was at hand: A case with visual and radar confirmation, multiple witnesses of high calibre, and filmed by a professional camera crew!

As you can see from the selection of images below, the variety of configurations filmed is far more than the few moments of footage shown in the news items would suggest!

Image result for kaikoura ufo

Image result for kaikoura ufo

In the resultant media frenzy, the debunkers lined up to take a shot. Venus,(note the pic on the bottom left in the montage is Venus for comparison), Jupiter, squid fishing vessels, Muttonbird flocks, “moonlight reflected from a cabbage patch”(?) meteors, temperature inversions… the list went on and on. “Venus does not, sort of, pass beneath the wings of your aircraft”, remarked Startup dryly.

And UFOs continued to be sighted and filmed in the days afterwards over Kaikoura:








Almost four decades later, there are still no definitive answers about what was being seen by flight crews, radar, and civilian ground observation, back in 1978, despite the massive number of theories.

Now, after re-examing the material in light of many years of research into esoteric military technologies as part of my quest for answers to the Christchurch Earthquake events, I believe I have a plausible explanation.

Two persons mentioned this explanation back in early 1979, and were practically ignored.

But back then, no one had internet……

What caused me to start looking back over this case were two factors; the release of the classified government report on the incident, and the Christchurch earthquakes of September 2011 and February 2012 (and the thousands of ongoing aftershocks). My subsequent quest for knowledge about HAARP and ionospheric modification led me to look back through the report with fresh eyes.


Although the government issued a press release summing up their investigations and conclusions, the actual report, for some utterly unfathomable reason, was stamped “Restricted” and kept under wraps for 30 years, thus fuelling unfounded speculation and rumour (or maybe that was the point?).

Here’s a sample of quotes that set the tone:

-the reporting officer is of the opinion…

-the reporting officer speculates…

-might have been caused by…

-possibly caused by…

-may well be explained in due course.

Get the picture?

Let’s hear some more honest snippets:

-no explanation can be offered for this observation.

-it is difficult to explain the lights…..

So, this report is all opinion and speculation, dressed up as an authoritive explanation. A whitewash.…

But there’s something else here. Check out these bits of impressive sounding jargon:

-anomalous propagation (ducting)

-freak propagation

-super refraction

-radar contact produced by ducting

-inversion layers

-radar double bounce

Now, these extraordinary collection of freak atmospheric conditions supposedly persisted through December 78 and January 79! That’s got to be some kind of record. Wouldn’t one think all these freakish conditions would excite the attention of meteorologists around the world? I can’t find one paper, lecture, or article, outside of UFO literature. And those radar returns. Spurious returns are usually transitory and and quite distinguishable from solid aircraft returns. They certainly don’t sit on the radar for 45 minutes or track other aircraft, let alone play cat and mouse with them.

And yet it seems clear that something extraordinary was going on in the skies over New Zealand, but it was concentrated into concentrated, highly localised pockets and acted as if under intelligent control.

The terms used to describe the phenomena sounded very familiar to me as a result of my Research into HAARP, Over the Horizon Radar and other atmospheric modification programmes.

I am reminded of something called AIM; Artificial Ionospheric Mirrors. An ionospheric heating device, such as EISCAT or HAARP concentrates on a point of the ionosphere until it creates a miniature aurora, a visible bubble of plasma. This plasma bubble acts as a mirror to bounce radar beams over the horizon.

Image result for artificial ionospheric mirror…

This is however, not the solution to the Kaikoura phenomena, as such plasma bubbles were not sustained for any more any appreciable duration until very recently, and are high up in the ionosphere and several kilometres in diameter.

NRL scientists produce densest artificial ionospheric plasma clouds using HAARP

Yet, with NZ and specifically Canterbury being involved ionospheric modification and OTHR research for decades, I had a feeling that similar technology was involved in this case.

Perhaps something on a smaller scale, like portable projectors.

But why in full public view? Despite the official report claiming a dearth of ground witnesses, I’ve personally spoken to plenty of regular folk who witnessed these phenomena, all the way from Banks Peninsula to Kaikoura, and Fogarty claims “hundreds” saw the lights.

And the NZ defence forces, even decades after the event, claim no exercises of any kind were underway at the time. But then, let’s have look at the careful wording of the official Press Release.

The defence forces are “certain” that it wasn’t aliens from another world, or from a hostile nation, and make great show of poor little NZ’s lack of a defence budget. Like the restricted official report, it’s what the press release fails to mention that really stands out. If you eliminate extreterrestrials and earthly hostiles, that leaves “friendly” nations; allies. Australia and the US being the most likely candidates.

So again, why in public, and for what purpose?

The exposure to pilots, radar, and ground witnesses must have been intentional. Not just a technological test, but also a psychological test. A test of reactions?

And in order to really answer “why”?, we must ask “what”? And “how”?


I found it in Quentin Fogarty’s book, Let’s Hope They’re Friendly.

On page 120 is the following:

A… sighting was advanced soon after the sightings by a man who claimed he had worked for the top secret Royal Air Force Projects, “Hookdown” and “Sidescan”. He told a New Zealand newspaper that the objects seen and filmed off the Kaikoura coast might have been top secret, remote controlled drones. The man theorised that the drones, used to decoy radar from an attacking strike force, were being tested by the United States military from the nearby secret military installations  at Mount John, and from a US tracking station near Christchurch. He suggested the Americans were testing their advanced drones on civil aviation radar.”

Interesting, but clearly just theory and speculation. So far I have found no info on the two projects mentioned, and frustratingly no name is given for either the source or the newspaper he informed. Very interesting though, is the mention of drones (something wee are all familiar with three decades on) and the mention of Mount John and a “tracking station near Christchurch”. Does he mean the infamous Weedons antenna? “….to decoy radar”? Interesting.…

Let’s back up to page 119:

“captain John Randle suggested to me that the efforts to denigrate the sightings, and the witnesses, were designed to cover up EXPERIMENTS IN HOLOGRAPHIC TARGET DECOYS (my emphasis) by the Australian and New Zealand navies. HE SAID EVERY “BUT WHY” WAS ANSWERED BY THIS HYPOTHESIS AND LESS PROOF HAS BEEN USED TO HANG PEOPLE.”

Captain Randle went on to say the lights he witnessed that sent beams down to the coastline were most likely a fleet of four or five helicopters, which also suggests a military operation of some sort.

Tellingly, the official report mentions Randle’s helicopters in order to dismiss them as car headlights, suggesting Randle’s estimate of 1000ft altitude to be poor judgement!

He is then quoted at the top of page 120:

“I THINK IT WAS HOLOGRAPHY OR INTERFEROMETRY PRODUCING THE WHOLE AFFAIR and can’t see little green men at the bottom of the plot”

So two people talk about radar decoys. One says drones, the other says holograms. Perhaps both were used?

I remind you that these words were spoken in the late 1970s.

Holograms were science fiction as far as the public were concerned. The rest of Randle’s claims probably went right over the heads of most people. But after re reading Quentin Fogarty,s book after the earthquakes in 2011, I highlighted the terms he used and began looking online to find out if there was any substance to Randle’s hypothesis.

First, there are some things noted by Bruce Maccabee, the well known US Navy Optical Physicist and UFO researcher, who did exhaustive analyses of the footage.

BM notes that the blue-white object brightens, fades, and momentarily vanishes and reappears, consistent with AN IMAGE GOING THROUGH FOCUS, but well beyond the camera’s focus range.

Regarding the large object familiar to TV viewers, BM notes that the image brightness starts low, brightens dramatically, then dims again. As it does so, there is “symmetry inversion”, as the object image flips over, simultaneously shrinking then expanding. This indicates “effects characteristic of GOING THROUGH FOCUS”. However, notes Maccabee, “when I last spoke to Crockett he was adamant that the lens was not out of focus and the large dim object on the film was very much like the object he saw through the eyepiece”.

So lets apply some logical thinking. Both objects mentioned went through a dramatic change of image focus. Dave Crockett, a professional cameraman, is adamant his camera wasn’t responsible. CONCLUSION: THE UFOS THEMSELVES WENT THROUGH A FOCUS CHANGE. Projected images of some sort ?

The final giveaway in the footage lies in possibly the most famous single frame of film footage on all of UFOlogy, the “ampersand” still.

If this movement, captured in a single frame, was caused by the object itself, and the object were ten nautical miles from the plane, as indicated on radar, then it travelled 17000 metres per second, resulting in a bone pulverising, metal crushing, 800,000 times the force of gravity. A poorly maintained flying saucer with a backfiring warp drive?

A sensible theory is that it was the camera being bumped or jogged that caused the image.

Maccabee doubts this explanation based on the mass and rotational inertia of the camera, although he doesn’t discount the possibility. However, Dr. Richard Haines attempted to reproduce the image with a camera aboard an aircraft and a bright lightsource, and was unable to produce anything remotely as complex as the “ampersand”.

So once again, applying the same logic as before, then if the recording apparatus didn’t produce the effect, the probably the apparatus PROJECTING the image was jogged.

Ever used a laser pointer? Try projecting the laser onto a wall, and no matter how steady you hold it, even the slightest movement of the hand causes the light to wiggle around, resulting in a complex pattern if captured on camera, as in the examples below:

So the film itself provides some evidence suggesting that the UFOs might have been projected images of some sort. They change focus and the “ampersand” image suggests that the projecting apparatus was momentarily subjected to a knock or vibration.

But wait.

How does a hologram show up as a solid radar return?

And an Air Force Orion aircraft sent up to investigate similar returns in early January 1979 saw no objects but encountered severe pockets of turbulence. Do holograms cause turbulence and unusual atmospheric conditions?

This is where the references to Ionospheric Mirrors and OTH radar come in to the picture.


Neither a solid nor a gas, it can be generated by heating ionised atmosphere as demonstrated by HAARP.

It can be used to reflect or bounce radar beams therefore it can surely generate a return.

Remember though, this is 1978. Was such technology possible back then? Raytheon currently sell a drone radar decoy, the Nulka, that is capable of hovering in one spot, and several used together can give a ship sized radar return. Significantly this decoy was developed by the Australian Navy in the right time frame for the Kaikoura incidents. But it is no hologram, more like a missile.

But, there is plenty of material out there to suggest there is some real substance to the idea of a plasma radar decoy that is capable of steered movement.…

“By using a powerful laser and a converging lens, it is possible to ionise air locally at the point of focusing. If, for example, the lens has a focal distance of 1 metre, a bubble of plasma forms itself “miraculously” at a distance of 1 metre from the lens and seems to float in the air. By using an infrared laser, the rays of which are normally invisible to the naked eye, the result is very spectacular. But in order to project this “UFO” at great distance, it would be necessary to use a very powerful laser and a lens capable of focusing at the distance of projection. It is, therefore, more efficient to use a matrix of lasers converging towards a given point in the sky.

The first high energy lasers worked by means of carbon dioxide (CO2) and within the infrared scale. They appeared in the United States in 1968. The CO2 was inserted at one end of the laser while the residual non-toxic gases were expelled on the other side.

The first attempt to convert this into a transportable weapon was carried out by the US Army. Towards the middle of the seventies, a CO2 laser with a power of 30 kilowatts was mounted on a caterpillar-tracked vehicle LVTP-7 so as to create a “Mobile Test Unit”.

At the end of the seventies, the German Diehl company came up with a similar prototype, the HELEX (High Energy Laser Experimental). It consisted of a 28-ton armoured vehicle intended to carry a high energy CO2 laser with a power of several megawatts, whose range in clear weather would have reached 10 kilometres (fig. 11-a). The required consumption :of CO2 would allow up to 50 laser shots at each sortie.”

“What interest would the military have in developing such equipment? We can list several possible uses:


To produce Atmospheric ionospheric mirrors (see AIM above).


To produce radar decoys or visual decoys so as to deceive the enemy


To illuminate an enemy site for an extended period of time, as if it were daylight.


To put a mark on an enemy target for the purpose of guiding a missile, or to turn an enemy missile towards a false target and making it explode.


To suppress the toxicity of a combat gas spread by the enemy, by causing a reaction with the plasma produced


To disturb or destroy at long distance electronic, electric or electromechanical (motors) equipment with a particle beam


To cause fires or sever electric cables by melting them…”

So, it would seem that the answer is yes, it could have been done in 1978, and yes plasma bubbles would have worthwhile military applications. This, then, would seem to be the likely answer to the mystery, and the reason for the whitewash official report and the carefully worded press release statements.

Like Randle said, less evidence has been used to hang people and every “why” is answered. Even the reported weather inversions and “super refractions” are explained by heating and ionisation of localised pockets of air.

Still not convinced? Here’s practical demonstration:

Looks familiar?

Image result for atmospheric plasma hologram

That flickering effect has caused at least one UFO researcher to claim that the object filmed by the TV crew was a “Chinese lantern” (read my objections to his conclusion in the comments below the clip):

(be sure to check out waytofarout2C’s stabilised UFO footage. Even though I disagree with his conclusion on this, he’s a sensible and objective researcher)

Finally, the government’s official report, if you look really hard, does indeed mention plasmas as a possible cause of the sightings and radar returns!…

*There was, right here, a link to declassified UK government memorandum on plasma based Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, a PDF. It was the smoking gun. A mindblower. This is not a joke. The PDF was lifted from Google and my link vanished. I received immediately afterwards a notification from Google about unusual activity on my account triggered by my search “plasma holographic radar decoy”.  I have searched my history and it’s gone. Wow.

Real XFiles stuff!


How did John Randle, a commercial pilot, know all this so casually back in 1978?

After all, this was before the internet, and holograms, as far as the general public were concerned, was the stuff of Star Wars. This was material that would surely have been highly classified.

So I decided to try and find out more about this John Randle. Perhaps something in his history would explain his apparent knowledge?

Tracking him down turned out to be a formidable task. Obviously he existed as Fogarty and the DSIR investigators communicated with him. One article added the info that he was John B. Randle.

I tried emailing a Peter Randle in the aviation industry to see if he was a relative, got no response.

Finally, I found this:…

So now we have the one and only candidate for the identity of the mysterious Mr. Randle. Armed with this extra detail, I tried searching online among records of births, deaths, viticulturist in the Marlborough region. Nothing. No further info.

At the time of finalising this blog, I have contacted who are devoted to this aircraft and the pilots who flew it. They also maintain an interest in the Kaikoura UFO mystery, so I figure if anyone knows anything about Randle, they will.

One more thing: at the climax of Close Encounters, when the alien mothership is revealed, R2D2, the hologram projecting robot of Star Wars, can be seen perched on the rim. A subtle clue perhaps I wonder?

Image result for close encounters mothership r2d2

Hope you enjoyed the blog. All feedback and constructive criticism is welcome!

(reposted from my blog page at the


Top Secret US Nuclear “City Under The Ice” Revealed


A top-secret cold war US military project and the toxic waste it conceals, which had been thought buried forever beneath the Greenland ice cap, are likely to be uncovered by rising temperatures within decades, scientists have warned

Nuclear waste tank

Camp Century was excavated by the US army engineering corps in 1959 around 200km (124 miles) inland from the coast of Greenland, which was then part of Denmark.

Powered, remarkably, by the world’s first mobile nuclear generator and known as “the city under the ice”, the camp’s three-kilometre network of tunnels, eight metres beneath the ice, housed laboratories, a shop, hospital, cinema, chapel and accommodation for up to 200 soldiers.

Officially its personnel were stationed there to test Arctic construction methods and carry out research. Scientists based at the camp did, indeed, drill the first ice core samples ever used to study climate, Colgan said, obtaining data still cited today.

But in reality, the camp served as cover for something altogether different: a project so immense and so secret, that not even the Danish government was informed of its existence.

“They thought it would never be exposed,” said William Colgan, a climate and glacier scientist from the Lassonde school of engineering at Toronto’s York University, the lead author of the study. “Back then, in the 60s, the term global warming had not even been coined. But the climate is changing, and the question now is whether what’s down there is going to stay down there.”

The study suggests it isn’t.

Project Iceworm, presented to the US chiefs of staff in 1960, aimed to use Camp Century’s frozen tunnels to test the feasibility of a huge launch site under the ice, close enough to fire nuclear missiles directly at the Soviet Union.

At the height of the cold war, as the US and the USSR were engaged in a terrifying standoff over Soviet missile deployment in Cuba, the US army was considering the construction of a vast subterranean extension of Camp Century.

Around 4,000km system of icy underground tunnels and chambers extending over an area around three times the size of Denmark were to have housed 600 ballistic missiles, in clusters 6km apart, trained on Moscow and its satellites.

Eventually the engineers realised Iceworm would not work: the constantly moving ice was too unstable an environment and would have deformed – perhaps even collapsed – the tunnels.

From 1964 Camp Century was used only intermittently, and three years later it was abandoned altogether, the departing soldiers taking with them the reaction chamber of the nuclear generator.

But they left the rest of the camp’s infrastructure – and its biological, chemical and radioactive waste – where it was, on the assumption it would be “preserved for eternity” by the perpetually accumulating snow and ice.

Thus far their assumption has proven correct: up to 12 metres deep at the time it was abandoned, the ice covering Camp Century has since thickened to around 35 metres and will continue to deepen for a while yet.

But climate change looks certain to reverse that process, Colgan and his six-strong team, from Canadian, US and European universities, said in their report, published last month in Geophysical Research Letters.

Greenland’s temperatures broke new records this spring and summer, hitting 24C (75F) in the capital, Nuuk, in June – a figure that shocked meteorologists so much they had to re-check their measurements.

Between 2003 and 2010 the ice that covers much of the island melted twice as fast as during the whole of the 20th century. This year it began melting a month earlier than usual.

The researchers studied US army documents and drawings to work out how deep the camp and its waste – estimated to include 200,000 litres of diesel fuel, similar quantities of waste water, and unknown amounts of radioactive coolant and toxic organic pollutants such as PCBs – were buried.

Then they ran regional and global climate change simulations to work out how much longer they will stay there. Based on the “business as usual” climate change scenario, Colgan said, snowfall will continue to be greater than ice melt for a few more decades. “But after that, melt will be greater than snow. Every year, another layer of ice will be removed. Our estimate is that by 2090, the exposure will be irreversible. It could happen sooner if the magnitude of climate change accelerates.”

Once that starts to happen, the question of who is responsible for the clear-up – already the subject of discussion – will become more pressing, the report said, presenting “an entirely new form of political dispute resulting from climate change”.

With no established agreement on the question, the report says the “multinational, multi-generational” problem posed by Camp Century and its waste could become a source of tension between the US, Greenland and Denmark.

Although Denmark allowed the US to build Camp Century and other bases on Greenland in a 1951 agreement, it is not clear how much it was told about the work being done there, or the waste left behind. Complicating matters further, Greenland became largely self-governing in 1979.

Vittus Qujaukitsoq, Greenland’s foreign minister, said he was “concerned” about the camp’s future and is determined to establish responsibility, while his Danish counterpart, Kristian Jensen, has said the issue was being examined “in close contact with Greenland”.

The Pentagon has said it “acknowledges the reality of climate change and the risk it poses” for Greenland, adding that the US government has pledged to “work with the Danish government and the Greenland authorities to settle questions of mutual security”.

Source: MSN News.

Site Icon -SmallI’m sure you’ve noticed the emphasis on Global Warming in this item, something the most of you will be sceptical about I’m sure. What’s the agenda here?

Don’t forget to share your opinion with us.

Are Ya Feelin’ Lucky?


The “Android Like” Lester Holt: From John Rappaport.

By Jon Rappoport
Others have pointed out how many times debate moderator Lester Holt slanted criticism toward Trump, rather than Hillary. Others have suggested Hillary and Holt were a tag-team, with Hillary throwing hand signals to Holt indicating she was ready to hit Trump with a zinger.
On a different level…
Watching the debate-host, Holt, working his way through Trump vs. Hillary, sitting in his chair, bathed in a spotlight glow against a sea of total darkness, eerie metallic glimmers reflecting from his glasses, I was reminded of Dr. Eldon Tyrell, the barely human chairman of the corporation that designed androids in the film Blade Runner.
—Holt, the man who had the script and the questions and the facts at his immediate disposal. The brain. The wisdom figure. The synthetic guide with a touch of humanity built in.
Quite an archetype.
As I pointed out recently, the ridiculous notion of a debate with a moderator is modern. When Lincoln and Douglas famously debated slavery for hours at a time, over the course of several weeks, there was no intermediary voice. One man spoke for an hour, and then the other man spoke for an hour.
The moderator is a prop, a pretense of introducing objectivity into the proceeding.
The moderator is the “voice of rationality,” as it were. From that perch, he can, of course, slant the event—and Holt certainly did.
His dry speech patterns, in fact, resembled those of Barack Obama, when the President is reciting script.
Watching Holt operate, I was also reminded of the technocratic wet dream of a human brain hooked up to a computer, from which emanates undeniable wisdom.
Holt adopted the persona of a machine, and he pulled it off.
Which means? This is where the world is heading, if the technocrats have anything to say about it. You “need the best data—and one day soon you’ll get the data from a computer your brain is connected to. All will be well.”
Holt is also NBC’s national news anchor, which means he tells the stories of our time, every night, to millions of tranced viewers who are seeking a voice not their own.
Anchor and debate moderator—a powerful combination.
Hypnotically commanding.
Replay the debate moment when, out of nowhere, Holt’s words suddenly crackled like dry autumn leaves: “[Stop and frisk] was ruled unconstitutional.”
The narrator thus spake.
A brain not their own…a voice not their own…a narrator of reality…a fount of instant wisdom…the answer from on high…there are many, many people who want those things, and they want them embodied in a machine-like structure that assures them of dispassionate “honesty.”
Holt provided.
It’s no surprise that giant television networks have made these debates their own property. After all, the companies consider the events media-moments. Hosting them and appointing the moderators is no different from designing and presenting the nightly news broadcasts.
Of course, when you stop and think about this arrangement for debates, it’s absurd. Why would Lester Holt be more qualified to guide the proceeding than a car mechanic from Peoria?
Why have a guide at all?
Why allow media companies or government entities or even non-profit organizations a place in the debates? The two ruling political parties are the correct sponsors. We’re watching their candidates.
Holt was a well-groomed device. A hint of the near-future. A figure of “just-enough-authority” sitting in the darkness, dispensing voice-of-god to the masses, backed up by a production crew with split-screen, miced-up, podium-on-stage technology to provide a fatuous imitation of a real debate
Instead, let there be a stage in a glen. Two or three television cameras. Let there be a topic. Foreign policy. Hillary ascends the stage and speaks for an hour. Then she leaves. Trump appears. He talks for 90 minutes. Then Hillary comes back for 30 minutes. The candidates never speak to each other. There is no moment-to-moment exchange of daggers or jokes or gotchas. This isn’t entertainment. It isn’t grins or hair or dress or tie or teeth.
If there is a moderator, he stands down off-stage and to the side, grumpy and frowning, holding an umbrella in case it rains. He reads a book while the candidates speak, he eats a hot dog. He combs and re-combs his hair. He waits. He thinks about his 20-dollar-an-hour salary. He must remain absolutely silent.
He’s an actual prop put there to remind people of a time when things were different, when the so-called news was delivered by media stars, who competed to see which ones were the most clever at inventing reality that seemed factual, but wasn’t.
In a world with a shred of sanity, that’s what Lester Holt would be doing.
What is modern television news (including debate moderation)?
From their perch, anchors can deign to allow a trickle of sympathy here, a slice of compassion there.
But they let the audience know that objectivity is their central mission. “We have to get the story right.” “You can rely on us for that.”
This is the great PR arch of national network news. “These facts are what’s really happening and we’re giving them to you.” The networks spend untold millions to convey that false assurance.
The anchor is the narrative voice of his time, for all people everywhere. The voice that replaces what is going on in the heads of his audience—all those doubts and confusions and objections in the heads of the great unwashed. The anchor will replace those and substitute his own plot line.
The network anchor is The Wizard Of Is. He keeps explaining what is. “Here’s something that is, and then over here we have something else that is, and now, just in, a new thing that is.” He lays down miles of “is-concrete” to pave over deeper, uncomfortable, unimaginable truth.
The anchor must become comfortable with having very little personality of his own. On air, the anchor is neutral, a castratus, a eunuch.
This is a time-honored ancient tradition. The eunuch, by his diminished condition, has the trust of the ruler. He guards the emperor’s inner sanctum. He acts as a buffer between his master and the people. He applies the royal seal to official documents.
Essentially, the anchor is saying, “See, I’m ascetic in the service of truth. Why would I hamstring myself this way unless my mission is sincere objectivity?”
All expressed shades of emotion occur and are managed within that persona of the dependable court eunuch. The anchor who can move the closest to the line of being human without actually arriving there is the champion.
The vibrating string between eunuch and human is the frequency that makes an anchor great. Think Cronkite, Chet Huntley, Edward R Murrow.
The public expects to hear that vibrating string. It’s been conditioned by many hard nights at the tube, watching the news.
There are other reasons for “voice-neutrality” of the anchor. Neutrality conveys a sense of science. “We did the experiment in the lab and this is how it turned out.”
Neutrality gives assurance that everything is under control.
Neutrality implies: we, the news division, don’t have to make money (a lie); we’re on a higher plane; we’re performing a public service; we’re like a responsible charity.
The other night, Lester Holt was the machine-like agent of the Cosmic Charity of All Souls dedicated to higher wisdom from an unimpeachable source. That was his role and he played it.
“I take no sides. I have no opinions. I am objectivity personified. I am…The Fact Checker.”
Use this link to order Jon’s Matrix Collections.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Despicable! Clinton Foundation Caught Watering Down Aids Drugs


Site Icon -SmallThis has got to be damaging to the campaign. Ouch….!Clinton Foundation

Despicable: Clinton Foundation Caught Watering Down AIDS Drugs to Africa

Watch on Youtube:

Ever wonder WHY mainstream media agencies ALL report the news with the SAME spin?


Ever wonder WHY mainstream media agencies ALL report the news with the SAME spin?


The information below reflects the nepotism that exists between Government and Corporate Media…

Perhaps this is why both Trump and Bernie claim it is rigged!


ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser.


CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications.


ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney


ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama’s Deputy Press Secretary


ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama’s Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood


CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.


You think there might be a little bias in the news?


For Some REAL news, see the following links:



Christopher Bollyn: 


Uncensored News Network:  


Dr. Horowitz & Sherri Kane-Revolution Television:



Site Icon -Small

Lunar Anomalies: The Vitally Object Analysed



Image result for moon

Take a good look at the links above and you will find a staggering resource of images that suggest everything is not as tranquil and barren on our lunar satellite as NASA would have us believe. For decades now, researchers like George H. Leonard, Colin Wilson and Richard Hoagland and more recently, David Ice, have been highlighting strange facts about the Moon and artificial looking objects photographed on the surface.

Issue #45 of Uncensored features one of the more obvious anomalies in the form of tracks made by some tall, highly reflective object (a boulder say NASA) that resolutely travels up and down hills, avoiding gullies, while other rocks remain unmoving. Bear in mind these pics were taken decades ago. Something of ours from a secret space program? Something extreterrestrial, from some other place or indigenous to the Moon?

Take a look, and share your thoughts and theories with us!























Are Ya Feelin’ Lucky?






As reported in the latest issue of Uncensored Magazine, Google has ignited outrage by apparently deleting Palestine from Google Maps, but in subsequent developments, Google has defended itself by claiming Palestine was never labelled on Google Maps in the first place!

Google also  says that West Bank and Gaza were missing due to “a bug” that is being fixed (just gets better doesn’t it?).

Read more at these links:

And of course see the many links in the mag. Don’t have it? Just make a comment and be in to win a Year’s subscription!

Site Icon -Small